The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Review change
|
|
Analyse results of change Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify areas where planned improvements have occurred Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take action to sustain improvement by standardising Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify areas which have not met predicted outcome (positive and negative) Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine cause of target not being met Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take action to improve the value stream Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish scope of value stream activity
|
|
Identify key individuals within value stream organisations Completed |
Evidence:
|
Jointly identify possible areas of study |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agree on a protocol for undertaking value stream improvement activities |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Confirm special conditions of activity |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Study possible value stream improvements
|
|
Arrange meeting with suitable representatives of the value stream members Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agree on extent of current implementation of competitive systems and practices in value stream |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agree on opportunities for improvement and current or anticipated restrictions |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work with value stream representatives to determine root cause of restrictions |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Work with value stream member to identify possible solutions to problem |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Define outcomes from proposed changes |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Develop a consensus approach to implementing improvements
|
|
Calculate cost-benefit to each value stream member from the proposed changes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Decide whether the proposed improvements will result in a perceived improvement to the end customer |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine ecological, economic and social sustainability impacts of the change |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agree on proposed change with key stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Obtain required approvals
|
|
Write a formal proposal for the changes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Submit proposal for required approvals from stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Modify proposal in liaison with all key stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Obtain required sign-off in accordance with procedures |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Measure and communicate gains
|
|
Agree indicators and metrics of success of proposed changes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Facilitate the collection of necessary data |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Arrange for the data to be analysed and presented in an agreed format to the agreed stakeholders |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Agree on the communication plan |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Liaise with stakeholders to implement changes as agreed and approved
|
|
Analyse results of change Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify areas where planned improvements have occurred |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take action to sustain improvement by standardising |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Identify areas which have not met predicted outcome (positive and negative) |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Determine cause of target not being met |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Take action to improve the value stream |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|